Camaroextra
02-15-2006, 06:40 PM
I finally felt the need to take of my tb and take some pics of it.
Did this myself, im very pleased with how it turned out, and the throttle gains suprised, i didnt think it would help as much as it did.
But i did the math, and if you know anything about LS1 tb you know taht the throttle blade is 75mm across, but right in front of it there is a lip that makes a bottle neck, this opening is 70 mm across. sooo i did some math
all of this is calculater for WOT
area of a circle PIExRadius^squared
3.141592 X 35(radius of bottleneck)^2 = 3848.45 sqMM
3.141592 x 37.5(radius of blade)^2 = 4417.86 sqMM
also with cutting out the half shaft thats minus an extra (75mm wide x 5mm tall) 375sqMM
since both areas have the blade profile and the bottom of the throttle shaft, were not going to factor that, because we have enought numbers
so therefore before porting- 3473 sqMM
without the bottleneck- 4418 sqMM
the difference is 945 sqMM!!!!!!!
WTF was GM thinking?
but i suck at math so this may be wrong
oh yeah the pics, they are huge, so here is one and a link to the rest
http://photobucket.com/albums/a80/camaroextra/Throttle%20body/
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a80/camaroextra/Throttle%20body/tb001.jpg
Did this myself, im very pleased with how it turned out, and the throttle gains suprised, i didnt think it would help as much as it did.
But i did the math, and if you know anything about LS1 tb you know taht the throttle blade is 75mm across, but right in front of it there is a lip that makes a bottle neck, this opening is 70 mm across. sooo i did some math
all of this is calculater for WOT
area of a circle PIExRadius^squared
3.141592 X 35(radius of bottleneck)^2 = 3848.45 sqMM
3.141592 x 37.5(radius of blade)^2 = 4417.86 sqMM
also with cutting out the half shaft thats minus an extra (75mm wide x 5mm tall) 375sqMM
since both areas have the blade profile and the bottom of the throttle shaft, were not going to factor that, because we have enought numbers
so therefore before porting- 3473 sqMM
without the bottleneck- 4418 sqMM
the difference is 945 sqMM!!!!!!!
WTF was GM thinking?
but i suck at math so this may be wrong
oh yeah the pics, they are huge, so here is one and a link to the rest
http://photobucket.com/albums/a80/camaroextra/Throttle%20body/
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a80/camaroextra/Throttle%20body/tb001.jpg